Vade Retro Satanas. The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters !

Coherent Raman Effect in Atomic Hydrogen Cocorico !

Jacques Moret-Bailly
 

The expansion, what expansion? And if one suddenly realized to examine the Coherent Raman Effect in atomic Hydrogen present everywhere in the universe...

  1. The CREIL effect, or how Cosmology almost did not inherit expansion.

  2. Recipe: Fabricate your own quasar

  3. Rational astrophysics.  §  

    Jacques Moret-Bailly points out that this is not a new theory, but an application of ordinary spectroscopy to a simplified "Strömgren model", in which:
    - The stars are very hot black bodies.
    - Stars emit "stellar winds" consisting essentially of a hydrogen plasma.
    - At a distance (~ 10 AU for the Sun), the "Strömgren sphere" is the place where the plasma condenses into excited atoms.
    - The excitation of the atoms disappears beyond a "Strömgren shell" (~ 10-15 AU).
    *****************
    The laws of ordinary spectroscopy apply. In particular, far from the heavy stars (stars, planets), the gas pressure is so low that the free path of the atoms lasts more than 10 nanoseconds, that is to say more than the duration of the electromagnetic pulses which form the light of an atom, Thermal origin. Thus, in this medium, light-material interactions are spatially coherent, so that Einstein's theory applies, in particular superradiance (which explains the brightness of the limbs of the Strömgren spheres compensated by the absorption of light Of all stars not located near this limb), and the SSRI, coherent impulse Raman effect (which explains the reddening by energy transfer to the electromagnetic thermal background.)
    As you see, the author does not construct a new theory, he applies only the well-known laws of coherent spectroscopy to a medium known to all, whereas, according to Menzel who denies the importance of optical coherence in nebulae. Astrophysicists ignore superradiance and SSRIs.
    Note : This document had been published on https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-0145473v2.
    L
  4. Why make it complicated (big bang) rather than simple. (ordinary physics) in astrophysics?  §  
    In a document published on August 23, 2017, Jacques Moret-Bailly asks: "Why, in astrophysics, make it complicated (big bang) rather than simple (ordinary physics)?
    Astrophysicists are unaware that all the interactions of light with the gases under very low pressure, which fill almost the whole universe, are spatially coherent. This omission is filled by a theory (ΛCDM) and improbable complements (expansion of the Universe, variation of the fine structure constant, dark matter, black energy, etc.)
    The dipole interactions of light with interstellar gases construct rings that are more or less visible and regular; the quadrupole interactions construct the spectra of the H atom in the quasars, showing that Hubble's law does not measure distances but column densities of the excited H atom.
    Note : This document had been published on https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01576435 (French)

     

 
Création date: 17/02/14
Last update: 15/09/17
Fred Hoyle