 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Vade Retro Satanas,
Hide these Fluctuating Satanic Resemblances... |
The Co(s)mic
Microwave Background: |
 |
|
We had
COBE, we almost had MAP, And we had
WMAP.
And Big Bang was confirmed.☻
|
The measures were made in radio waves.
|
The Digital Processing have for the main part consisted of:
|
Bands |
Frequencies
in GHz |
-
Integrating thousands of measures made in every pixel
of the map and for all the used frequencies.
-
Eliminating the light coming from the Galaxy.
-
Eliminating the dipole generated by the
movement of the satellite with regard to the CMB.
|
K |
23 |
Ka |
33 |
Q |
41 |
V |
61 |
W |
94 |
|

|
Some people assert that the quality obtained in thr
CMB chart is as good as were the expectations.
Everything is there. The cosmological constants were measured with a
remarkable precision, and the fluctuations in the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) indeed there, with a precision of 10-5.
|

|
And everything would be fine in the best of all
possible expanding worlds, if only this map had not reminded me of a digitally
processed image of our galaxy, the Milky Way.
|
 |
Source of the image:
2Mass |
An attentive exam, of the image obtained by
WMAP and the
DP image of the
Milky Way, shows some
very similar big structures. Let us note that these two maps
were not realized with the same system of projections, and that the image
of the Galaxy does not cover the whole sky.
|
Discussion |
-
These similarities are purely fortuitous.
Before excluding this
hypothesis, it is advisable to examine the other possibilities.
-
The used radioelectric system that was used
could have some technical imperfections, for example :
-
The directional antennaes,
containing a pair of elements directed at 180° with respect to
each other, could be asymmetric. Or also, they could have secondary
lobes allowing them to receive frequencies from unknown sources.
This is readily possible, as
the required technical quality for measuring 10-5
fluctuations is very difficult to realize. (I have some
practical experience in this domain).
-
Amplifiers, filters, and
heterodynes detectors would be sensitive to the infrared
frequencies used by the 2MASS.
This is in fact improbable, as
respective wavebands are too different. And their physical
properties are too different.
-
The digital Processing of the WMAP data
could be defective.
It seems quite unlikely; the
used methods are very well known and very sure. The statistical methods
were applied to thousands of measures realized on every pixel of the map.
(Monte
Carlo Method). We could naturally apply other algorithms, but
there is a strong chance that it would change nothing in the final
result.
-
Residual radiation stemming from the Galaxy would
not have been eliminated correctly in the calculations.
Although the disruptive
radiation stemming from the Milky Way is perfectly well known; they had
already been measured during the
COBE experiment, and the results had been used in the
calculations of WMAP).
But we should not exclude completely this hypothesis. In fact certain
radiation sources are far from stable. And weak variations of luminosity
of some of the objects in the Galaxy could have occurred over time, thus
perturbing the results of the calculations. These sources would just
need to have variations of luminosity in the order of 10-5!
which would be almost undetectable by the usual methods of photometry.
-
If we eliminated from the CMB the light of the
Galaxy, it is necessary, in any logic, to eliminate also the lights
stemming from all the galaxies of the universe which make their rates in
the effects parasites too.
It was not manifestly made. It is the most
total silence on this subject which is nevertheless fundamental. We find,
on this subject, no publication. This silence would explain for two
reasons: there is no means to sort out and to eliminate these lights. To
make this confession would be admit that all the works concerning the
CMB are archi-false!
-
The presence in our galaxy of more or less
homogeneous matter, (gas or
dusts) would absorb slightly the the CMB radiation.
The presence of this
interstellar matter is a perfectly well-known fact. But then, one needs
to demonstrate that it is this matter which is relevant to the observed
fluctuations.
-
The existence of some as yet unidentified
radiation, whose spectrum is very similar to that of the CMB which would
disrupt the measurement of the CMB.
This possibility had not been foreseen in March, 2003, because it
seemed very unlikely.
But some observations, were made in April, 2003, with the
ISO
(Infrared Space Observatory) Satellite,
and published in April 11, 2003 in
Science
«The cosmic infrared background: a fossil record of galaxy
encounters
» - D Elbaz and C.Cesarsky.
A summary of this article is available on the site
of CEA-DAPNIA, under the title: "La
mémoire fossile des rencontres de galaxies".
There is a diagram in the article the comparing the radiant
curves of COBE and ISO.
It shows the
curve of ISO approaching that of COBE, at the maximum of
the curves. Thus, both
radiations can very well interfere with the WMAP measurements.
-
The microwave 'echo'
of the big bang may in fact have been modified or 'corrupted' as it
passed through galaxy clusters on its way to the Earth.
This corruption would
show only on small-sized fluctuations of the CMB. It would
confirm that all the galaxies, ours in particular, and in general all
galaxies clusters are sources of corruption for the CMB.
Then, MNRAS published on January 13th, 2004 a
document which indeed seems to show this phenomenon:
arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0306180 - Evidence for
an Extended SZ Effect in
WMAP Data A.D. Myers, T. Shanks, P.J. Outram, W.J. Frith,
A.W. Wolfendale.
-
According to
physicists of the CERN, (D. J. Schwarz et al), errors would have
been done during the WMAP data analysis.
 |
The text reveals that (We
cite):
"The large-angle (low-ℓ) correlations of the
Cosmic Microwave Background exhibit several statistically
significant anomalies compared to the standard inflationary
cosmology. We show that the quadrupole plane and the three octopole
planes are far more aligned than previously thought (99.9% C.L.).
Three of these planes are orthogonal to the ecliptic at 99.1% C.L.,
and the normals to these planes are aligned at 99.6% C.L. with the
direction of the cosmological dipole and with the equinoxes. The
remaining octopole plane is orthogonal to the supergalactic plane at
99.6% C.L". |
In summary, it means that
the CMB is, for the main
part, a local phenomenon.
Because it is :
-
Correlated with the
ecliptic plan, thus to the Solar system.
-
Correlated with the
galactic plan, thus to the Galaxy.
|
-
And finally, the coup de grace:
An item published under the title "Un reflet trop parfait" in
Ciel & Espace N° 427 December 2005, attracts our attention. It
relates the observations and the computations, made by Richard Lieu
and Jonathan Mittaz - University of Princeton (On
the absence of gravitational lensing of the CMB), on the effects
that the gravitational lenses, generated by clusters of galaxies, should
have on the CMB.
Their results are clear. Thus, on perfectly known gravitational lens
(Abell 2218 among others) we should observe effects on the CMB on
the order of 10%. In fact we find less than 3%. (Perhaps zero?)
Abell 2218 (Source HST)
 |
|
Expected » 10 %)
 |
|
Achieved < 3%)
 |
The mass of Abell 2218
is pretty well known. Therefore it is relatively easy to predict its
lensing effects on the CMB. The disagreement with the
observations is blatant. We can explain it in variant ways:
-
The calculated mass of this
cluster could be incorrect. (excessive quantity of black matter?)
-
The cosmological model should
be revised. (General relativity? Big Bang? Black matter? CMB? etc.)
In fact the only reasonable, and simplest
solution, would be to admit that
The CMB appears, in the
foreground of Abell 2218! And therefore that the CMB would
not be cosmological at all.
-
And if you still had some doubts:
August 3rd, 2007
Lawrence Rudnick
Shea Brown et Liliya R. Williams publishe the discovery of a
region of the universe in
which there is nothing, neither galaxies, nor even CMB.
The left image is extracted from the the CMB
map.
That of the right-hand side corresponds to the same region investigated
with the
NVSS.
The explanation of the phenomenon, which is proposed to us by
Lawrence Rudnick et al and resumed by "Astronomy
Picture of the Day" ( NASA), would consist of the fact that
this CMB region was not actually
very cold nor little dense but light from the spot somehow
became more cosmologically
redshifted than normal along the way by a gravitationnal lens
phenomenon (Sachs-Wolfe Effect).
To accept this explanation, the distribution of radio sources should
not correspond to a lack of matter (NVSS) and also it
would be necessary to observe a very marked gravitational lens effect,
what manifestly is not the case.
Anyway it is to admit implicitly that it can exist abnormal redshifts
such those which were put in evidence by
W.M. Napier. From the point of view of the supporters of the Big
Bang theory it is not acceptable because then it would be necessary to
admit a Raman Effect in a
rarefied gas (Creil
Effect) that would validate
Jacques
Moret-Bailly's theory.
Why this phenomenon of abnormal redshift takes
place here and not beside nor why it would be rightful to generalize it
to all the fluctuations in the CMB?
The only
possible explanation is clearly that the CMB is intrinsically connected
to the presence of galaxies that is perfectly compatible with
the Creil Effect.
Conclusion: There also we see that
the CMB has nothing cosmological but is a
local phenomenon
But then, how explain the anisotropy, proved by COBE,
revealing the 600 Km/s movement of the solar system with regard
to the CMB?
 |
The
movements of the galaxies in the universe are aleatory. The
Global CMB
thus seems still to us. As a consequence if our galaxy has a self
movement, then necessarily an anisotropie due to the Doppler
effect is revealed.
Let us note that our galaxy
Specific CMB
is not enough dense to mask the
Global CMB. |
|
The standard theory says that:
|
-
The 2,7 K CMB is a black body radiation.
-
It is the residue of the light emitted after the Big
Bang, when the material has become transparent to light.
At that time the temperature of the matter was approximately 3000 K.
One can compare this plasma with the photosphere of a red star of the
same temperature, except that we compare only the MHD
activities of the plasmas, and nothing else.
-
What we see today of the CMB is a "photography", perceived after
13 billion years, of this particular moment.
-
The observed fluctuations are at the cause of the
matter becoming lumpy and forming galaxies, stars.
-
he Cosmological Constants calculated from the
measures made with WMAP corresponds to the theory.
|
What the standard theory does not say, or
says very discreetly.
|
-
The amplitudes (1.10-5) of these
fluctuations are too weak by two orders of magnitude to be able
to explain the formation of lumps. So, here also, one
hypothesizes a mythical
black matter, which
no one has still found any slightest sample.
-
The calculated Constants are rendered exact only by
adjusting the parameters with respect to each other. And finally,
there is always one which never succeeds in succeeds in being calculated
correctly.
|
Can we consider some other hypotheses, while staying within the
framework of the Standard theory? It is on this perilous exercise that
we are, very foolishly,
going to venture.
|
☻ |
|
Questions
and
Hypotheses |
-
What was the density of the matter when the universe
became transparent? The answer is simple, it was of order of
4 g/cm3.
(Condition of transparency). Let us note that this value depends on
physicists! (100 g/dm3, 10-12 g/cm3,
etc.)
-
To simplify, it was a globally spherical universe,
thus an expanding bubble of high density gas. In fact its density could
not be homogeneous. There had to be a
density gradient. The
transparency thus probably propagated from the surface towards the
nucleus of the bubble, and it took a lot of time. This means that all
the values of density were true somewhere and at some time !
-
What was the radius of the universe at this moment?
There is no obvious answer. We do not know the mass of the universe. We
must therefore consider two hypotheses.
-
Either
the universe was still small enough that all the elements of system
can be considered as connected together (Homogeneity and
isotropie).
-
Or this
condition was not met
-
In the first case we can legitimately consider that
it behaved as a resonating chamber. We should then find
periodic and stationary fluctuations in density as in a drum.
-
In the second case, there cannot be periodic or
standing waves. We would have at best random or chaotic fluctuations.
-
What do we observe in fact? Do the WMAP images
show periodic fluctuations?
No!
-
Are they random or even chaotic?
Yes!
-
Thus the elements of the universe were
already disconnected and the speed of propagation of the density
waves was too small to allow the formation of well characterized global
standing waves.
-
What are these chaotic waves physically?
They are waves of pressure in an
ionized and massive gas. (Acoustic waves).
-
Consequently: One must necessarely
associate waves of refractive
index gradient to these density waves.
-
Miracle! We have such a physical
model in the sky : the
Crab Nebula. But as this model corresponds to a small bubble,
we therefore find standing waves, and waves of refractive index gradient
propagating in the nebula.
-
These refractive index gradient have
therefore induced very
important refractory effects. And these are effects that
the CMB would keep in memory.
-
Such refractory effects had to produce
optical lens phenomena of great
amplitudes. The CMB variations were "optically" magnified.
Thus it is necessary to
reduce their magnification in order to take into account a considerable
swelling factor as yet undetermined. (108 as
in the heart of the Crab nebula?)
|
Vibrations of the Cosmic Drumhead.
(According to J. P. Luminet)
 |
The Trilogy of the Crab
- The Snag of the Crab
- Effect of Refringence in
the Crab
- A Wandering Snag in
the Crab
(Source HST).

Magnifying power # 108 of times
? |
Source:
University of
Chicago - News Office
 |
|
This careless exercise,
in which we played comes to an end on March 16th, 2006 with the
publication of the polarization map of the large-scale CMB. This one
returns us to the physical reality.
|
☻ |
|
(Source :
NASA-WMAP)
New
 |
In large-scale, the
Polarisation of the CMB seems centred on our galaxy.
It draws clearly the lines of
force of a magnetic field, the one of the Milky Way.
Whatever say about it some people, this polarization does not need black
matter to find an explanation.
Thus the CMB is a phenomenon associated to the milky way, and more
generally to all galaxies. It is a
purely local phenomenon.
-
Bibliography of WMAP Science Team Publications.
-
Foreground Polarization.
-
Polarization Analysis.
|
Conclusions : |
-
There is no causality
relation between the fluctuations in the CMB and the formation of the
galaxies, neither in the standard model, nor moreover in any other
model.
-
To call upon a hypothetical
black matter does not justify itself.
-
New models of the formation
of galaxies must be imagined.
-
The CMB has nothing of a
primordial light.
|
|
 |
§
The CMB seen by Planck
§
On 17 and 18 October 2013,
ESA
publishes on the Internet the following documents:
1 -
Hemispheric asymmetry and cold spot in the Cosmic Microwave Background.
2 -
A portrait of the cosmos as a young Universe. We recommend
that you read the final comment. We wonder to know
what epicycle will be necessary to save the standard
cosmological model.
|
|
Documents to be consulted |
-
In the Crab Trilogy:
-
The Snag of
the Crab
-
Effect of Refringence in the Crab
-
A
Wandering Snag in the Crab
-
Observational Cosmology: caveats and open questions in the standard
model (Martín López-Corredoira
- 06/01/2006)
-
Is the
low-ℓ microwave background cosmic??
-
On the absence of gravitational lensing of the CMB
-
New
Nine Year Results on the Oldest Light in the Universe
-
Beam
profile sensitivity of the WMAP CMB power spectrum (U. Sawangwit & T. Shanks - Durham University, UK)
-
New A
Cold Cosmic Mystery Solved. (Institute for Astronomy.
University of Hawaii. Szapudi et al)
-
New CMB_&_Laniakea
(French). Bernard Lempel - 5 Oct 2018
|
CONCLUSION: |
The Big bang
Universe is Cracked |
☻ |
|
|